🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising number of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," stated one MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely unfolding at the regional level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.